Why did you think it was important to join the PHNX jury this year?
I think it is important because, between last year and this year, many things happened at a technological and general level, which makes me think that it will have a strong impact on creativity. So a little out of natural curiosity and a little to be able to give my criteria to judge great creative work is the reason why I am happy to be part of it.
What do you think of our hybrid jury, featuring creatives but also strategists, clients and people from all corners of the industry?
I think it is a great bet that will surely invite us to reflect more deeply on the final results of the festival. Having a broad vision of the work will serve to build a broader and more comprehensive general creative criterion.
What do you think of the idea of free entry until the shortlist stage?
I think it is a differentiator compared to other festivals, which invites you to take risks regarding the type of work entered. I think it helps refine the criteria for what work to include, not only in the Phnx awards but in the entire spectrum of festivals in the world.
How would you define the perfect PHNX Awards winner?
I think the perfect winner of a Phnx Award is an idea that has equal components of creative disruption in execution, as well as in strategy and real-world impact.
What is having the biggest impact on creative trends at the moment?
I think the secret is that there is no formula and that's what makes this so exciting. I could tell you the application of technology or craft or relevance at the level of social platforms, but none of that is set in stone. So I guess the best way to sit down and judge ideas is to keep an open mind and be very attentive to how an idea applies to a given brand and context.
Who would you nominate as your two or three “creatives of the year”?
Hard to say. There is a lot of talent right now in the world. I guess the best way to find out is to see the work.